Categories
Uncategorized

Spotlight: Celebrating John Groover’s Leadership in Med Tech Recruiting

Meet John Groover, long-time Partner and Leader at Strawn Arnold. John’s medical device career spans over four decades, providing an ideal foundation for his transition into executive retained search.

John began his medtech career in 1982 with Ethicon Endosurgery. “There were 25 of us in their first sales training class, all white, one woman,” John shares. “This one woman trainee ended up running all of Ethicon Endosurgery.” Indeed, John has made diversity a priority, identifying and recruiting the next up-and-coming diversity superstars in medtech. “One of my proudest achievements is placing perhaps the highest-ranking female executive in large cap medtech to be recruited from outside of the organization. We all talk about how important diversity is, but to make an impact with key diversity placements takes more than just talk.”

After five years at J&J, John spent equal time at GE Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Sulzer Carbomedics, where he served as President. In 2002, after the sale of Carbomedics, John considered two CEO offers but chose not to relocate his family. He joined Strawn Arnold in 2003 to start their medical device practice. Initially, he placed key executives at Medtronic, J&J, Boston Scientific, and Abbott, before focusing on the venture community. Over the past five years, John has placed dozens of C-level executives with smaller, mostly privately-held medtech entities, primarily as CEOs.

John credits his 20 years in industry leadership roles for his success in retained search. “To perform like a partner for clients, you need to have sat in their chair. Companies succeed or fail based on the successful outcome of the search. You need to take full ownership of that to be successful.”

We at Strawn Arnold celebrate John’s dedication, which has placed us at the forefront of medtech retained search for two decades.

Categories
Uncategorized

Celebrating 50 Years of Strawn Arnold

Celebrating 50 years of excellence, Strawn Arnold has stood as a beacon of leadership in executive search within the life sciences and healthcare industries.

As we honor this milestone, we reflect on the words of our founder, Jerry Arnold: “Over the past 50 years, the central focus of the firm has been to identify outstanding people for our internal needs and those of our many clients. We’ve been successful on both counts. Over this period, our superb staff and partners have identified and placed thousands of exceptional leaders in hundreds of companies across our great country.

“We want to thank our many clients for putting their faith and confidence in us, and for allowing us to help you grow and prosper. We’re looking forward to the next 50 years with both anticipation and excitement. We hope you’ll allow us to be of continued service to your company. Outstanding people are the lifeblood of a growing and prosperous organization. It truly has been a great 50 years for the firm.”

Here’s to half a century of dedication and to the many more years of serving the life sciences industry ahead.

Categories
Uncategorized

Avoiding Common Pitfalls for Better Hires

by Jeff Ashpitz

As an executive search professional with decades of experience placing stellar leaders in pharmaceutical and biotech companies, I’ve witnessed firsthand the critical impact of a well-executed search process and the costly repercussions when it goes awry. Here, I share insights into common pitfalls in the hiring process and strategic solutions to avoid them.

  1. Underestimating the Role’s Impact: The ripple effect of a key hire is profound. Spend time on a thorough analysis of the role’s impact on the organization to ensure alignment with your long-term objectives.
  2. Failing to Get Consensus from Key Stakeholders: Consensus on role requirements is foundational. Regular communication and alignment among stakeholders prevent shifting goalposts that can confuse candidates and derail the search.
  3. Inflexibility on Role Requirements or Prerequisites: Flexibility can open doors to candidates who bring a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective. Consider potential over a rigid checklist of qualifications.
  4. An Overly Restricted Candidate Pool: Diversity in thought and experience drives innovation. Broadening the candidate pool to include unconventional profiles can uncover hidden gems.
  5. Neglecting Company Values: A candidate’s skills are crucial, but their alignment with company values is what cements their potential for long-term success. Integrate values assessment into your hiring criteria.
  6. Rushing the Process: Every organization wants their role filled yesterday, but haste can lead to oversight. Diligence in candidate evaluation pays dividends in securing the right fit for your leadership team.
  7. An Overly Slow or Cumbersome Process: Conversely, an excessively slow process can deter top talent. Streamlining the process without compromising on quality is the sweet spot for executive search.
  8. Allowing Future Direct Reports to Undermine the Process: Involvement of future direct reports is valuable, yet their unchecked influence can skew the process. Establish clear boundaries and decision-making protocols.
  9. Waiting Too Long to Engage a Search Firm: Proactivity is key. Anticipate leadership needs and initiate the search process with a search firm early to avoid rushed decisions, a drawn-out process, or a candidate pool turned-off by a position that has been too long on the market.
  10. Choosing a Search Firm Based Solely on Cost: Investment in a quality search firm often translates to higher caliber candidates and a smoother search process. Evaluate firms on their track record and expertise, not just cost.
  11. Choosing a Search Firm Based on Name Brand or Size: A big name doesn’t always mean the best fit. Tailor your choice of search firm to the specific needs and culture of your organization. A boutique firm can offer specialized expertise in your industry coupled with a high touch process that may be lacking in a “big box” firm.
  12. Poor Candidate Experience: The candidate’s journey reflects your brand. Ensure that each interaction is professional, respectful, and reflective of your organizational values and that the process is organized and streamlined. Getting a preferred candidate to yes is often almost as much about their experience in the interview process as about the role itself.
  13. Not Providing Clear Feedback After Interviews: Providing clear feedback after interviews is crucial. It enables your search team to hone their approach so that subsequent candidates are better aligned with the hiring team’s needs. This iterative refinement process enhances the efficiency of the search.
  14. Avoiding Compensation Discussions Until Late in the Process: Transparency about compensation early in the process avoids last-minute deal breakers. Address it early to ensure alignment on expectations. No one wants to get jilted at the altar.
  15. Failing to Woo the Finalist Candidate: The final stage is critical. You’ve spent time carefully considering your candidate pool, have engaged them with a compelling narrative about the role and the company’s vision, and have selected a finalist. Your finalist has successfully run the gauntlet. As you near the offer stage, roll out the red carpet and let them know they would be a welcome member of the team. Arrange for lunch or dinner with the hiring committee or hiring manager during the final round of interviews. Schedule time with the benefits coordinator or a relocation specialist. Let them know that you want them to join as much as they do. These little touches can ensure a smooth offer process and ultimate acceptance.

Executive search is a strategic process that requires a thoughtful approach. By avoiding these common pitfalls, you can enhance your ability to attract top-notch leaders who will drive your organization forward.

Categories
Uncategorized

Spotlight: Celebrating Jeff Ashpitz’s Dedication to Excellence in Search

Meet Jeff Ashpitz, long-time Partner and Leader at Strawn Arnold. Jeff’s transition from a seasoned industry professional to a distinguished figure in executive search is a narrative of dedication and expertise. With a robust background in life sciences, Jeff’s nearly three decades of corporate experience laid the foundation for his remarkable 26-year tenure at Strawn Arnold.

His journey began with Eli Lilly in Canada and the US, followed by significant roles at American Cyanamid (Lederle Pharma, Davis+Geck) in the US, Europe and Asia and as President of the Zimmer Europe Division of Bristol-Myers Squibb. His career encompassed responsibilities across commercial operations, R&D, manufacturing, and C-level management. This comprehensive industry insight equipped Jeff with an unparalleled ability to discern top talent, shaping his approach to executive recruitment.

Jeff’s philosophy is simple: the right candidate in the right position at the right time is mission-critical. His leadership at Strawn Arnold is characterized by a relentless focus on results and personalized service, earning the firm a reputation for best-in-class recruiting in the life sciences and healthcare sectors. Jeff’s story is not just about career evolution; it’s about setting a benchmark for excellence in executive search.

We applaud Jeff’s unyielding dedication to our clients and his impact on biotech and pharmaceutical leadership and the organizations and patients they serve.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Sirens’ Song of “Been There, Done That”

by Jeff Dodson

In Homer’s timeless epic, “The Odyssey,” we follow the hero Odysseus on his perilous journey home from the Trojan War. He is forewarned by the goddess Circe of the Sirens, enchanting yet lethal creatures who lure sailors to their doom with their captivating songs. Circe’s warning of a “meadow filled with skeletons” serves as a stark reminder of the perils that await those who succumb to the Sirens’ beguiling call.

This ancient tale echoes in modern boardrooms and hiring teams, where companies often seek out senior executives with the promise of “new thinking” and rapid advancement, yet paradoxically, they also desire candidates with a proven track record in the same or very similar job—”been there, done that” profiles. While not an impossible feat, an overly rigid focus on experience in the exact position, without a willingness to embrace new mindsets, can be a siren song leading to failure. It’s akin to ignoring the meadow of skeletons of past hiring missteps, with assurances that this time, there will be no need for change.

Over my twenty-four years in executive search, including over 300 successful searches primarily within life sciences, I’ve witnessed a growing trend: firms almost exclusively pursuing executive candidates who have already walked the path they seek to tread, often in the same job. This approach is particularly prevalent among private equity firms, whose understandable objectives are to rapidly increase EBITDA over a short time period. For them, long-term executive development and cultivating a robust talent pipeline are secondary.

Companies with a vision for the long-term should not be constrained by these limitations. Executives often express frustration with the limited growth potential within their teams and the desire to bring in new talent that can ascend to higher roles. They seek individuals who can inject fresh ideas and perspectives. Yet, despite good intentions, many organizations falter. The culprits? A pervasive risk aversion and internal resistance that stifle innovation and defer too heavily to consensus when making pivotal hiring decisions.

To excel in hiring practices, companies must navigate common pitfalls with a robust process. Here are some insights and helpful tips to improve the hiring process:

·       At the executive or senior director level, consider whether past experience in the same role is as crucial as leadership qualities, the ability to drive change, and strategic acumen. The ideal candidate will likely have a team or organization handling the day-to-day tasks and the executive must focus on larger things. It’s not about transplanting a factory manager from General Motors into pharmaceutical R&D leadership, but rather recognizing that innovative solutions can be valuable and are usually present in any industry.

·       While there is still much to be done, companies have made commendable progress over the years in various aspects of diversity, and it must continue. However, diversity of thought and diversity of experience often receive insufficient attention, overshadowed by traditional industry practices – i.e., this is the way it has always been done.

·       Too much focus on what a candidate lacks can blind organizations to the potential of that person to bring fresh perspectives to the table – things that more functionally narrow people may not possess. Failure of imagination can mire an organization in short-term thinking. Hiring teams must assess candidates not only with short-term goals in mind but also with a vision for the future and appreciation for what a non-typical candidate can offer.

·       A hiring process can be undermined by too much reliance on consensus. While executives may publicly welcome internal competition, they often look for excuses to dismiss potential rivals.  They may find it easy to dismiss unconventional candidates for not having the typical “been there, done that” experience, which becomes a convenient reason to eliminate them.

The art and science of executive hiring lie in recognizing the trade-offs in candidates and finding a balance. Just as the most rewarding home renovations are those that reimagine the space, not just polish the floors and repaint, the most strategic executive hires are often those who think differently.

Shakespeare’s words in “Measure for Measure” resonate profoundly in this context: “Our doubts are traitors and make us lose the good we oft might win by fearing to attempt.” It’s a reminder that our hesitations can be our downfall, leading us to miss out on the success that a bold approach to executive recruitment could bring. The blunt views of Shakespeare’s  Lady Macbeth are also useful to recall. She in essence speaks about the importance of process, mindset, and resolve when she tells her husband, “The attempt and not the deed confounds us.”

In the end, it is the courage to pursue the attempt that defines our path and propels us forward – the boldness to try, to innovate, and to potentially transform our organizations.

Categories
Uncategorized

Want Great Leaders? Put Cultural Fit at the Top of Your Recruiting Wish List

by Jenny Crutchlow

We all have our wish lists for top candidates, the must-haves that are necessary for success in any given leadership position and the nice-to-haves that make a candidate a dream placement. But beyond educational credentials, licensing, sector and functional experience, and career progression and achievements, the significance of cultural fit in hiring cannot be overstated. Organizational leaders not only shape the strategic direction of their organizations but also set the tone for their company’s culture and values. Finding candidates who align with your culture is paramount for long-term success and organizational cohesion.

What is cultural fit? It means a lot of things to a lot of people but can include shared values, work ethic, communication style, and leadership and management approach, among others. When executives are culturally aligned with the organizations they serve, they are more likely to thrive in their roles, build strong relationships vertically and cross-functionally, and drive positive outcomes. On the other hand, a lack of cultural fit can lead to discord, inefficiency, and ultimately underperformance. At worst, a misalignment on culture can lead to a failed placement, quite an expensive mistake.

When considering who to partner with in searching for leaders, don’t leave out the importance of assessing for this critical piece of the recruiting puzzle. Choose a firm that can help with:

1. Deep Understanding of Company Culture. Your partner should invest time and effort to gain a thorough understanding of your organization’s culture, core values, and strategic goals in order to accurately assess candidates based on both explicit and implicit criteria.

2. Holistic Candidate Evaluation: Your partner should look beyond a resume, beyond technical skills, education, and experience, and delve into factors such as leadership style, communication preferences, and interpersonal dynamics. They should also be able to assess whether a candidate has the competence to grow culturally with an organization and to successfully engage all constituencies.

3. Access to Exclusive Networks: Your partner should have extensive networks within your industry and functional areas, enabling them to identify candidates who not only possess your must-haves but also exhibit the cultural attributes that will make them a strong fit for you.

4. Customized Search Strategies: Your partner should tailor their search to your unique needs, always with a view to your culture in mind.

5. Mitigation of Hiring Risks: Your partner should recruit with cultural fit in mind from the outset, helping to mitigate the risk of costly hiring mistakes. By aligning the executives they present to you with your organization’s culture, they greatly enhance the chance of employee engagement, retention, and organizational success.

6. Mitigation of Bias: Your partner can guide you away from the trap of institutional bias by evaluating candidates based on core values rather than on any unconscious biases that may exist within your hiring team, allowing candidates who may bring a fresh perspective to your organization to shine through while still adhering to those core values.

Some questions to consider: How do you define cultural fit within your organization? How do you balance the need for cultural fit with the need for diverse perspectives? What challenges have you faced in ensuring cultural fit during your hiring process? How has cultural fit or lack thereof impacted your organization?

Categories
Uncategorized

Placement Announcement

Congratulations to Nick Seibert on joining Future Pak LLC as Vice President of Business Development. We are thrilled to have partnered with Future Pak on this exceptional placement. Nick brings superb talent at building strong relationships coupled with his sales and business development acumen in pharmaceutical packaging to his new role. We wish him and Future Pak well in this great match.

Categories
Uncategorized

Spotlight: Celebrating Jenny Crutchlow’s Unique Skills and Experience

We’re thrilled to shine the spotlight on Jenny Crutchlow, Managing Partner, and member of our Executive Committee. Jenny joined our team in 2018 and focuses on the Medical Device and Pharma industries, working on Director, VP, and C-suite roles across functions.

Jenny hails from the great State of Texas and is an alumna of the University of Texas at Austin where she obtained dual degrees in Vocal Performance and the prestigious Plan II Honors liberal arts degree program and was honored with Phi Beta Kappa membership. She also holds a Master of Music degree in Vocal Performance and Pedagogy from Westminster Choir College in Princeton. After a professional performing career on stages in New York and across the United States, Jenny found her way to Executive Search, honing her recruiting skills at large retained search firms focused on the healthcare industry.

Reflecting on her journey, Jenny shares, “Transitioning to executive search from the performing arts has allowed me to leverage my diverse skills and experiences: tenacity, insight, empathy, creativity, process – to find and engage top talent for our clients and to help our candidates shape rewarding careers. I am grateful to our clients and candidates who trust me with their searches. It’s a responsibility I cherish.”

Outside of work, Jenny and her husband Ross enjoy immersing themselves in the arts and spending time with their three children and extended family in the Austin area.

Jenny’s unique blend of skills, experience, and passion makes her an invaluable asset to our team and clients. Join us in celebrating her exceptional contributions to Strawn Arnold!

Categories
Uncategorized

Celebrating 50 Years of Strawn Arnold

In a farmhouse in Austin, Texas, Bill Strawn joined Ken Houtz who had built a robust solo search practice after a storied career with Johnson & Johnson. When Ken retired, Bill sought to expand the firm and added Jerry Arnold to form Strawn Arnold. Over the next several years, biopharma executive David Leech was added to the Partnership, with a continued focus on high-level searches within the pharma sector.

In 1998, Jeff Ashpitz, a BioPharma/MedTech veteran was recruited to lead the emerging biopharma practice. David and Jeff’s addition cemented Strawn Arnold’s mission to provide exceptional retained search services with the expertise of former industry executives rather than a traditional leveraged model.

In 2003, the firm diversified beyond biopharma by adding medtech executive John Groover, who was President of Sulzer Carbomedics. Both Jeff and John went on to serve as Managing Director/President of the firm. Oliver Esman joined in 2007 to head the generic pharma practice, bringing strong CHRO-level industry experience to the firm.

Over the next decade, Strawn Arnold continued to grow with the addition of Chris Schneider (medtech, HIT, services), Mark Durham (biopharma), and Jeff Dodson (biopharma) to the partnership. Partners Barry Duke, Jenny Crutchlow, and Executive Vice President Jim Alexander also joined, all bringing significant industry experience. This expansion ensured Strawn Arnold offered partner-level recruiting expertise and comprehensive industry knowledge across life sciences and healthcare sectors.

Today, Strawn Arnold is recognized as one of the largest and most knowledgeable customer-centric retained search firms in the life sciences and healthcare market. Our Partners and EVPs tailor services to clients, maintaining a strong focus on partner-level results.